calvin's story

calvin's story
Showing posts with label jerry kill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jerry kill. Show all posts

10.01.2013

come out of the closet

Remember your child—or your sibling, niece or nephew—as an infant: pudgy legs, sweet smiles, bright eyes and soft hair smelling faintly of rosewater or beeswax. That was Calvin when he was eighteen months old, just before the first time we feared he might die.

He’d been sick with a fever that had spiked too quickly, triggering a four-minute grand mal seizure. Michael instinctively rocked Calvin's tiny body, which turned blue and convulsed, as time stood still. Since then it has happened again and again and again; no drug or dietary therapy has worked to stop them. At times, because of the drugs, Calvin has morphed into someone we’re not even sure we know. There was a time when we had to pinch his nose shut just to spoon medicine into his mouth, medicine that, even though it doesn’t completely work, if he doesn’t get he’ll likely have a prolonged, life-threatening seizure. We’ve given him powders and pills and liquids that have never been tested on—or approved for—children, medicines in which, as the drug literature reads, “The mechanism of action is unclear.”

My boy has never in his life taken a step without being under the influence of powerful, dizzying anticonvulsant drugs. He spoke his only word—Mama—once, just before the seizures began.

I recently sat at a table dining with several people who I’d never met before. The conversation drifted (or perhaps, like the fierce advocate I am, I steered it) to Calvin and to epilepsy. I explained some of the horrors of the disorder, of its stigma, its underestimation, its pervasiveness, it misunderstanding, its physical, emotional, financial and societal burdens. When I mentioned the difficulty of advocacy efforts—because few people admit publicly that they have epilepsy or are afraid to share that their children are afflicted—one of my dinner companions discreetly raised a solitary finger indicating to me both his struggle with the disorder and his reluctance to admit it to the rest of the group.

Sadly, I know a handful of people who are afraid to come out of the closet, and I can’t say that I don’t sympathize. Look at the heat that Minnesota football coach Jerry Kill got from the media when he suffered a seizure on the sidelines: journalists saying that fans shouldn’t have to risk witnessing a “middle-aged man writhing on the ground,” saying he should consider resigning, saying he should manage his condition better. But until at least the bravest of those with epilepsy face their fears, like Kill has, and come out, until they show the world what epilepsy is all about and until we as a society act compassionately toward people who suffer from the disorder, we’ll remain at this impasse. And as long as we continue to live in the dark ages of fear and ignorance, appropriate funding for research will not be assigned or raised, a cure will not be found, kids like my Calvin will continue to suffer the scourge of seizures and antiepileptic drugs, and parents like us will continue to worry that our children might die at the hands of this neglected disorder.

9.18.2013

the questionable journalism of gregg doyel or gettin' cheeky

After Minnesota's college football coach, Jerry Kill, suffered a seizure on the sideline during last Saturday's game, several journalists wrote about it. None of the authors of the articles that I have read seem to understand much about epilepsy. Sadly—and though I am angry—I am not surprised.

The article that this excerpt was taken from, asking whether (suggesting that) coach Kill should resign—ostensibly so that fans won't have to risk seeing a seizure or death from a seizure on the sidelines—was written, under what I see as the guise of sympathy, by Gregg Doyel of CBS Sports. He says:

But make no mistake about this, too: Jerry Kill's epilepsy is a major concern—and not just for Jerry Kill.

There will be people, maybe even most people who read this story, who will fall back on the default position that Kill is a grown man; if he wants to risk dying on the sideline—doing what he loves—that's his choice.

And you know what? In a vacuum, that's 100 percent correct. If Jerry Kill is OK with the risk to himself, who are any of us to tell him he's wrong? That's not our business.

But this issue, and these seizures, aren't happening in a vacuum. They're happening on game day, often right there on the sideline. This is an issue that's bigger than Jerry Kill and the personal risks he's willing to assume. What about the risks everyone else assumes? What if he has a fatal seizure during a game, in full view of the stadium?

That's our business.

I was so angered by what Doyel wrote and by his uninformed, discriminatory and back-assward opinion about epilepsy's impact on society, that I posted an impassioned comment that may perhaps have been better tempered by pausing before hitting the send button:

Mr. Doyel, What risks are you talking about, you ignoramus? Your journalism is so irresponsible it is shameful. And your readers are fairly uninformed about epilepsy, too. The fact that epilepsy affects nearly 3 million Americans (1 in 100), that 1 in 26 will be diagnosed with the disorder at some point in their lifetime, that 50,000 people die each year from epilepsy and related causes such as drowning and head injuries—which is more than die of breast cancer each year—the fact that at least 30% of people with epilepsy do not have their seizures controlled despite managing their condition by taking medications, that those who are lucky enough to have seizure control live a life tethered to anticonvulsant drugs and their heinous side effects, has nothing to do with whether Kill should resign, and has has everything to do with educating the public about epilepsy. The risk to the public having to see a seizure on the sidelines, even a fatal one, is nothing more than ZERO. NO RISK. And until people start to understand the disorder, its stigma, its pervasiveness, its paltry lack of funding, the rest of us will have to risk reading reckless journalism such as yours.

And though I am not proud for having called him an ignoramus, I feel as though I had to set the record straight with regard to his absurd notion of what he calls risk.

Revisiting the article today, I was pleased to see a flood of other comments by like-minded folks chastising Mr. Doyel for the offensive, small-mindedness of his commentary. But Doyel, in what appears as either cowardice, humiliation or pure and simply apathy, chose to reply to but a few comments, in one of which he says:

People have the right to work, absolutely. But to work ANY job? I don't know. Some jobs require, I don't know ... sensitivity?

To which I remarked:

yes, some jobs require sensitivity, of which you CLEARLY have none, nor do you have your facts straight. come on, dude.

I don't expect to hear back from Mr. Doyel, nor am I interested in listening to him stand his ground on a subject about which he is clearly, and comfortably, in the dark. Really. I'm thinkin' Neanderthal.

Gregg Doyel wielding small and primitive tools